Anyone who has tried to write any sort of sustained argument has surely suffered the burn of the brain’s betrayal – the moment when the words simply stop making sense on the page. As a graduate student interested in the executive functions of language I’m no stranger to this feeling (writing this short blog post will probably take me all day; the research proposal I’m writing is nearly killing me) but I also wonder why my brain feels so addled and achy.

As I’m learning, the answer to such questions is never simple.

Andy Clark’s (1997) analogy of the mangrove forest offers a compelling explanation.

A mangrove tree grows from a floating seed that roots itself in the shallow mud flats of a body of water. The seed sends out a complex web of roots that, as Clark notes, culminates in what looks like “a small tree posing on stilts” (p.208). Over time the web of roots traps debris floating through the water and eventually, where once there was only a tree on stilts, an island grows. Usually, trees need soil to grow but in the case of the mangrove, the tree itself creates the soil by trapping it over time. Clark uses the “mangrove effect” to think about language and thought.

Conventionally, we suppose that words are rooted in the soil of thought and yet, as the mangrove tree shows us, sometimes, it’s the other way around. Language, itself may create thoughts. In fact, Clark argues that language is a tool that has evolved to scaffold the generation of new, and complex ideas. Like other tools, we use language to accomplish what we cannot accomplish without them and this, of course, takes effort.

Where complex written arguments are concerned, Clark notes, “By writing down our ideas, we generate a trace in a format that opens up a range of new possibilities. We can then inspect and reinspect the same ideas, coming at them from many different angles and in many different frames of mind. We can hold the original ideas steady so that we may judge them, and safely experiment with subtle alterations. We can store them in ways that allow us to compare and combine them with other complex ideas in ways that would quickly defeat the unaugmented imagination. In these ways […] the real properties of physical text transform the space of possible thoughts.” (p.208)

Maybe the pain and disorientation of writing complex thoughts is just my interpretation of what Clark calls the “transformation of the space of possible thought.” Writer’s block may be the cost of growing a mangrove tree that wasn’t there before.

Clark, A. (1997). Being there: Putting brain, body and world together again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Mangrove Tree photo from: http://jkseward.com/Mangrove%20Tree.jpg

Share →
  • Mete

    I guess, although I hate when they want a written piece of essay in the classes I take, I do understand that my thoughts are all up in the air until I write them down. So, writing is indeed “creating the soil” as the mangrove trees do. In any case, though, writing is hard! : )

  • Kristen

    If only it were as easy as writing it down…I often find that writing reveals how much is missing in my thoughts so not only do I not have the soil, the seed of original thought isn’t viable as well. It is a difficult process, we can only hope that all our effort does in fact produce a full fledged tree.

    • Mete

      Don’t you love it when you suddenly realize that you actually have to read a lot more in order to be able to keep on writing?

      • Barbara Thelamour

        …as in the case of this darn proposal…yeah. I’m finding that written language is just one side. Reading is one aspect, and writing definitely makes thoughts concrete. The measure, for me, of how much I “understand” is the extent to which I can vocalize it. The complex thoughts somehow get even more jarbled as they leave my mouth, and I realize that whatever I’m trying to portray makes less sense than I originally thought. I want my mangrove tree to grow… :)

        • Mete

          Wait, did you just call your proposal “darn”? :)

  • http://hickstro.org/cccl/ Sara

    I love the vision of creating soil through the writing process. The root trappings that eventually become the nutrients for growth and stability create a curious image and have me wondering about what gets caught and if anything ever becomes unstuck, released to flow away from the churning soil. Writing is such a personal process, selective, ongoing and intricate. I imagine the drafts, the cast-off thoughts and brain-achiness that leave writers staring off in the distance. I wonder if the cast-offs and drafts end up caught in another tree’s roots–sharing the process–a mangrove writing group if you will.

  • Michelle

    Thanks for your comments –
    I chose to post on this topic because I think ideaplay.org provides a space for mangrove trees to grow. Clark (1997) also talks about the notion of distributed cognition (which makes me suspect he’s a Star Trek fan…think Jean-Luc Picard as Borg). In this space, your responses to my ideas shape my own initial thoughts. We’re all smarter together :)
    I’ll look forward to responding to each of your posts too :) The more we play with ideas, the better those ideas will become.